There may be some material on this site that is copyrighted, for which specific permission has not been granted. Mountainrunnerdoc.com respects copyright laws, but we have no control over messages posted and links included. Most often, posting copyrighted material on a public and noncommercial forum is considered to be acceptable. Most people consider such use of articles "fair use".

   This site, apart from an email scheduling convenience for patients of Dr. Holleran, is entirely noncommercial, provided exclusively for the enjoyment and possible enlightenment of its readers.

   This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Both Mountainrunnerdoc.com and visitors to Mountainrunnerdoc.com may make such material available in their efforts to advance understanding of health, science, fitness, and outdoor adventure.

   Mountainrunnerdoc.com believes this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without fee or payment of any kind to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. Mountainrunnerdoc.com has no affiliation whatsoever with the originators of this material except where it is its own nor is Mountainrunnerdoc.com endorsed or sponsored by said originators.

   For more information go to:http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.

   If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

   If for any reason you believe that material on this site does not fall within the fair use guidelines then please notify us immediately and we will take corrective action. § 107. Limitations on exclusive rights: Fair use 38.

   Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include-

   (1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes;

   (2) the nature of the copyrighted work;

   (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and

   (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work.

   The information contained herein is intended for educational purposes only.

   In freely posting such information on this website the website creator and contributors invoke "without Prejudice" U.C.C. 1-207, which effectively states that they have exercised the REMEDY provided by the Uniform Commercial Code in Book 1 at Section 207, whereby they reserve their Common Law Right not to be compelled to perform under any contract or agreement that they have not entered into KNOWINGLY, VOLUNTARILY AND INTENTIONALLY, and this "explicit" reservation serves NOTICE upon ALL individuals as well as administrative agencies and agents of National, State, and Local governments, that they shall not accept the liability associated with the "compelled benefit" of any unrevealed Commercial Agreement. This "remedy" is also in accord with the California Code, UCA 1207.

   The previous paragraph simply states that in the free exercise of a God-given or natural right (freedom of speech, freedom of the press, freedom to contract, etc.) one can not be tripped up by legalese and thousands of pages of administrative codes that supplant positive law and contain "adhesion contracts" that one might be unaware of but technically held accountable for by virtue of diabolically tortuous interpretations of ordinary language and actions!

   Every author should be happy if his/her articles are published on more then one web site, especially if there is a link from that web site to his original web site.

   The more links that are pointing toward your web site, the more visitors you get. Only people who don't understand the way the internet works would say "NO" to more links pointing toward their website, for what is the point in making a web site, if no one ever comes to read information on that web site?